The Troubling National Debt. It is projected to grow even larger. What does that imply for the economy?

31 Jul The Troubling National Debt. It is projected to grow even larger. What does that imply for the economy?

In 1835, something financially remarkable happened: the federal government paid off the national debt.¹

It hasn’t happened since. Through myriad presidential administrations and economic cycles, the national debt has persisted. Wars, depressions and recessions have all helped send it higher, and while it can shrink in the short term, it isn’t going away. Currently it stands at $17.6 trillion, with $12.6 trillion of it held by the public.²

The big picture is disconcerting. In fall 2013, the non-partisan Congressional Budget Office said that the national debt amounted to 73% of U.S. GDP. The CBO sees it declining to 68% of GDP by 2018, but then increasing to 71% by 2023 as a consequence of rising interest rates and spending boosts for Social Security and health care. CBO projections have the country’s debt equaling 100% of its annualized growth by 2038 – a milestone best not reached or approached.³

If the national debt should grow over the next decade, what would the impact be? It would be felt subtly, but it would be notable.

The greater the U.S. debt-per-capita, the greater the default risk for the federal government – meaning that newly issued Treasuries would need to have higher yields to appeal to investors. A bigger percentage of federal tax revenue would go toward paying the interest on the national debt, leaving fewer tax dollars for federal services and programs. Consequently, borrowing for economic enhancement projects would become harder, with a reduced standard of living for American households as a possible byproduct.⁴

Higher Treasury yields have three distinct implications. They can lessen appetite for risk; if the yields on Treasuries start to look pretty good compared to the returns on equities or corporate securities, investors may run to the “risk-free” Treasuries. Indirectly, this could encourage more inflation: higher Treasury yields could prompt yields on corporate securities to rise, which would force those corporations to hike prices on goods and services, i.e., inflation. Lastly, mortgages would become costlier as their interest rates are linked to Treasury yields and the short-term interest rates established by the Federal Reserve. Costlier mortgages imply fewer homebuyers, which in turn leads to lower home prices and reduced net worth for homeowners.⁴

Under current projections, what might happen by 2038? If America reaches to a point where its debt does roughly equal its GDP, a considerable economic price could be paid. In addition to a loss of confidence on the part of foreign investors, you would have a loss of flexibility on the part of the federal government.

Other nations might lose faith in our ability to pay our debt obligations. If that happens, we would find it harder or more expensive to borrow money. More and more federal borrowing could discourage private investment (although incomes and inflation-adjusted output could still rise). If the federal government needed to spend ever-increasing amounts of money to pay down the interest on the nation’s debt, shifts in fiscal policy and significant tax law changes would no doubt occur. The greater the percentage of federal spending given over to the national debt, the less capable the federal government would be to respond to an economic, geopolitical or environmental crisis.

The CBO’s forecast has sounded an alarm, and some view the national debt crisis as an emerging national security issue.

We incur some debt to foster economic expansion. Take the recent federal stimulus programs, for example. Taking on debt of that kind can be worthwhile as a step toward economic recovery. It is the other kind of debt – debt in response to today’s consumption – that risks handing future generations dilemmas.

While an ever-increasing national debt is a problem, a manageable national debt we can live with. We can’t turn back the clock to 1835. Andrew Jackson’s early struggles with debt as a land speculator led to his dream of a debt-free America with a federal government that didn’t need any credit. By selling off huge chunks of federal land and vetoing every spending bill that came his way, the seventh President cut the federal deficit from $58 million to $0 in six years. Coincidentally or not, a lengthy depression soon began.¹

Kevin M. Nast is the President of NastGroup Financial in Northville, MI. He may be reached at http://nastgroupfinancial.com or 248.347.1888. Kevin also services clients in Bloomfield Hills, MI and the surrounding metro Detroit area as well as 13 additional states across the US.

This material was prepared by MarketingPro, Inc., and does not necessarily represent the views of the presenting party, nor their affiliates. This information has been derived from sources believed to be accurate. Please note – investing involves risk, and past performance is no guarantee of future results. The publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services. If assistance is needed, the reader is advised to engage the services of a competent professional. This information should not be construed as investment, tax or legal advice and may not be relied on for the purpose of avoiding any Federal tax penalty. This is neither a solicitation nor recommendation to purchase or sell any investment or insurance product or service, and should not be relied upon as such. All indices are unmanaged and are not illustrative of any particular investment.

Citations.

1 – npr.org [4/15/11]

2 – treasurydirect.gov [6/19/14]

3 – cbo.gov [9/17/13]

4 – investopedia.com [10/11/13]